Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Varied / Hobbyist Emanon29/Male/United States Group :iconthe99percent: The99Percent
 
Recent Activity
Deviant for 7 Years
Needs Core Membership
Statistics 383 Deviations 13,722 Comments 39,196 Pageviews
×

Newest Deviations

Favourites

No Favourites yet.

Activity


I was asked my view of this "resistance".

My general view is I cannot take serious a movement who I feel morals and ethics are inconsistent to be fully honest. I have several followers who have the "I am the resistance" stuff on their pages and hey.. do you.

If you follow my facebook or twitter, then you already know my many issues with Obama.. and as such my origins for questioning this resistance starts there.

I will oppose Trump when he does terrible things, as I expect I will have to since I am an unapologetic leftist .. liberal..progressive..  but I will oppose Trumps on things I disagree with him as I did with Obama. My issue with many of these "resistance" people, usually or mostly Clinton supporters and Democrats (I did not vote for Clinton or Trump) .. is they were willfully blind when it was their team doing things.

Where was this resistance on a grand scale of marches, and such when Obama deported over 3 million people? breaking up families, causing so much pain? As a grand scale, they were nowhere.

Where was this resistance when some claim their most passionate about the environment when Obama approved 10 keystone sized pipelines just since 2010? I do not recall the massive marches against Obama for this.

Where was this resistance when Obama continuously armed Saudi Arabia who in turn used our weapons and are causing one the worst famines on earth in Yemen where millions of men, women and children are on the verge of starving because Saudi Arabia are using our weapons and refusing aid in some key areas? .. this happening under Nobel Peace Prize winner.. even after twice our own UN Ambassador under Obama asked him to stop selling arms to saudi Arabia and he..continued..

where was this massive resistance then?

Where was this massive resistance when Obama ran on protecting whistle blowers yet under Obama.. he has convicted more whistle blowers than every other administration combined..

Where was this resistance when just a week ago the DOJ, the Obama administration said all sixteen intelligence agencies will now receive the Metadata on American citizens and their international communications and other things? Surely an ever expanding government retaining more of your data is something worthy of resisting but... it was done under a Democrat so I guess not.



Now, should Trump be "resisted" sure, if he does things I disagree with I will call him out .. but you cannot just resist  when it is the other team doing something and then silent when it is YOUR TEAM.

If Trump loses in 2020 or he wins and you get a democrat in 2024.

if this democrat increased the number of places we are bombing, as Obama did when compared to Bush, will you resist?

If this democrat deports more people than the Republican before him, as Obama did when compared to Bush. will you resist?

If this democrat increases the countries that we have operations in will you resist? America now has operations going on in 33/54 African nations, that is 60% of Africa. AND THAT IS JUST WHAT THEY ARE ADMITTING TO.. who knows how many more we are.


So I admit it is hard for me to take some of the RESISTANCE people seriously because they seem to only want to resist when it is not their team doing it.

.. I especially have issues with some of these celebrities in the "resistance" who were going around saying if you did not vote for HRC then you are an idiot.. sorry, I cannot vote or someone that referring to black youth as super predators, that seemed to only mention black issues when she needed them to vote and was silent on em other times, who advocated for that which led to the largest arrest and incarceration of black bodies than at any other time in US history..
once again.. where was this resistance for this?


I love the constitution and as such I love the marches, peaceful marches going on around the country now.. but .. will these marches still be there when it is their party doing the terrible deeds or are they only there to resist Republicans and as many of my fellow leftists have been doing over the last 8 years, will turn a blind eye when it is TEAM DEMOCRAT

I will work with anyone to achieve mutual aims on things we agree with. So I respect and am sure on a lot of these issues will find myself in agreement with those who are marching today, but I also want to know are they only filled with anger because it is Trump or a Republican and will they continue such if a Democrat also starts doing much of the things they are claiming they are resisting?

But I find it hard to respect a resistance that did not stand up against a man who had an arm in one of the worst famines on earth .. that man being Obama. Now you cannot claim to care for human rights and then silent as someone you may have voted for, I voted for him, has a hand in such misery.

so that is one of the reasons why, though they have massive support judging from all of these marches that I am like eh.. when it comes to many of em.

Either something is wrong or it isn't. It cannot just be wrong when a Republican does it and then you turn a blind eye to the suffering of others when it is done under a Democrat.

I know many of my followers have different views, especially the ones who have all of the "I am the resistance" stuff on their page, but such is life.. everyone will have their own view on things.

I await to see if this resistance is simply resisting republicans or are just resisting wrong.. and on the "wrong" front Republicans do not hold an exclusive right to being wrong in our politics.
  • Listening to: 4 Non Blondes - Dear Mr. President
  • Reading: the words on the screen...
  • Watching: the screen as I type..
  • Playing: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: nothing
This will be a quick journal because two of my followers have sent me messages asking about it.

EMANON, DID TRUMP WIPE CLEAN THIS PART OF THE SITE BECAUSE IT WILL NOT BE PART OF HIS AGENDA

Not exactly.

The WH websites are always archived and scrubbed when a new administration is coming in.

when Bush became president (though the WH.gov was still in its infancy having only been launched in 1994.. when the net was still relatively young. it was made relatively bare other than the basics, Clinton policies removed...
(sometimes the wayback machine may change page links, so just go to archive.org/web/ and put whitehouse.gov and check the dates if they did that.)

January 18th, 2001 (Before bush was sworn in)
web.archive.org/web/2001011820…
Clinton  website, policy pages still there

Feb. 2nd 2001 (a few weeks after Bush was sworn in)
web.archive.org/web/2001020207…

site wiped bare, for Bush to start putting his policy stuff there.

January 19th 2009, (before Obama was sworn in )
web.archive.org/web/2009011906…

Whitehouse.gov full of policy links etc from Bush

January 20th, 2009 (inauguration day)
web.archive.org/web/2009012020…

Obama inauguration, policy pages of Bush erased.

January 19, 2017 (before Trump was sworn in)
still full of Obama's policies
web.archive.org/web/2017011923…

and now . January 21st.  (day after inauguration)
scrubbed and archived for the next administration
www.whitehouse.gov/

still rather blank with a few policy pages but nothing in depth as of yet.


so while as the Trump administration sets up the websites with his policies, .. I am not expecting any progressive, far-reaching things but just unsure why people are acting like the WH website being archived and scrubbed as it was from Clinton to Bush, from Bush to Obama..and now from Obama to Trump is somehow OH NOES!! WHAT HAS HAPPENED FOR THE LAST THREE NEW ADMINISTRATIONS IS HAPPENING NOW as if it has never been done before.. it is always done when a new administration is coming in.


Now, to repeat myself. When the Trump administration actually starts putting stuff on his website I am not expecting to agree with much of it but that is not the point of this piece


Now, if in 2020 Trump is defeated, or if in 2024 when the new President wins. you will see the day of their inauguration the Whitehouse website will be scrubbed and archived again so the next administration can start placing their policies and such on the site. It is not some massive conspiracy .. which is how some people are acting as it is.
  • Listening to: 4 Non Blondes - Dear Mr. President
  • Reading: the words on the screen...
  • Watching: the screen as I type..
  • Playing: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: nothing
I am sure the new administration that will be sworn in tomorrow will get me to start posting again. Though I am not expecting some AMAZING things, I am also not of the RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA nonsense.

I am a leftist, as such, I am sure I will not agree with much of Trump's picks, and will oppose those I generally disagree with. Understanding this, I am also a realist, as such as a leftist I cannot just pick someone who is to the right, since that is my expecting a president of a party I do not belong, of an ideology I do not ascribe to, to pick nominees that I would pick.

 I read Obama's 13 page and 25 page report and like the journalists that  I respect - Amy Goodman, Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, etc  I am of the view that Obama administration did not prove their case.. a report of maybe, could be. (another report was supposed to be released last week.. hmm funny how they did not release the report they claimed would actually prove the link) - shakes head.

I am glad Obama commuted Manning's sentence, but let us be clear that does not erase all Obama has done. Obama ran on protecting whistleblowers and has convicted more whistleblowers than every other administration combined

Obama ran on saying the era of mass wars was done. Obama has bombed more countries than Bush did.

What did the administration do a few days ago? now all sixteen intelligence agencies will get the metadata on US citizens, not just the NSA.


Obama ran on oh ..we will not have these deportation numbers like we saw under Bush.. Obama has deported more people than Bush.

So while ACA was better than what we had, it is not where we should stop. But with Republicans controlling the executive branch, legislative branch and once the next president gets his pick on the supreme court will control the judicial branch then we shall see what will happen.


I may add more to this later but I am in a rush and must be off now. I keep getting messages about will I be posting again and yes, I will. (throughout this primary and general I have written long pieces on my facebook. I may just start writing my facebook stuff and then also posting on here)

I have written very long piece especially on these "resistance" people and why I think their "resistance" lack moral and ethical consistency. If you want me post that here then maybe I will later or tomorrow.

Peace
[The core groups I mentioned that she needed to win  greatly or peel off were the youth, blacks, Hispanics, women and white males -the numbers are accurate as of this posting November 10, 2016 so may not be accurate as final vote tallies and may change some]

I will be discussing Why Trump won.. and no it is not just because of racism as some are claiming.

I will break down some of the reasons why Trump got more of the Latino vote than the Republicans did last time, why Hillary got less than a Democrat normally does

Why Trump got more of the Black vote than any Republican in 20 years, and why Clinton got less than democrats normally does

Why Hillary Clinton got less among the white male than Democrats normally do, and why Trump did very well among women and Clinton actually did worse among women did Obama  did in 2012.

Looking around some of the pages of my feed, I see a constant theme that Trump only won because of racism, we must be honest here.

The swing states that Trump won that basically put him over, yes, are vastly white and people point to that and go SEE!! RACISM.

But these same swing states, these same white men, and women went heavily for Obama in 2008 and 2012, both elections he was running against White males.. so you cannot say it is racism that Trump won these groups because hundreds of thousands, millions perhaps that went for Obama in 2008 and 2012, voted for Trump this time around so they voted for the black guy in 2008 and 2012 when he had two white challengers.. but they are racist and so that is the reason they voted for Trump?

Now, are there some within the Trump base that spout racist, xenophobic, sexist and other kinds of bigotry, of course, I would not deny that.

We must also look at the fact that the Democratic President is on pace and has deported many people and that also over the years have turned Hispanic/Latino voters against the Democratic Party. Trump's campaign said their goal, because they expected to do bad among Hispanic/Latino voters, their goal was to get 20% of this base.. what did Trump get? 29% .. so Trump got almost a third of Hispanic/Latino voters... so the Democrats must also admit their role in why this group that in 2012 The Republican only got 27% of the Latino voters, and in 2008 the Republicans only got 31% of the Latino voters.. why did Trump get more of the Latino vote than Romney did last time?

www.pewhispanic.org/2012/11/07…


On the other hand, Democrats in these years (1996-2012)
1995 Clinton got 72% of the Latino vote
2000 Gore: got 62% of the Latino vote
2004 Kerry got 58% of the Latino vote
2008 Obama got 67% of the Latino vote
2012 Obama got 71% of the Latino Vote

In 2016, Hillary only got 65% of the Latino vote, so she got less than what Obama did in 2008 and 2012

Why do I think this is? Because Obama, the DEMOCRAT has been deporting hundreds of thousands of people and this has made Latino support and confidence in the Democratic Party go down a great deal and as such, with the greatest of respect to Hillary Clinton..saying you are going to continue with Obama's policies when this group was not pleased with Obama's deportation numbers does not make them want to go rah rah.. Clinton.

Are you going to just say that is racism as well? that Latinos showed up more for Trump than they did for the Republican last time.. , or that they did not show up as much for Clinton as they did in the last few cycles for Democrats.

Another image I see going around is IF ONLY PEOPLE OF COLOR VOTED  and all 50 states were Clinton. No, that is terrible, this country is 70% [technically 68%]  White, so because people of color for decades generally go for the Democratic Party that means that their vote is correct?

Another image is IF ONLY WHITE MALES HAD VOTED.. and I believe like 40-45 states were Trump.. so that means white males are automatically wrong? No, white people generally and white males specifically are generally more conservative, are generally more right leaning, and do generally go for the Republican no matter who the nominee is. So we cannot say oh because Whites went to Trump, when whites pretty much always go Republican that means, of course, it is automatically racism.

Now, Black vote
www.gallup.com/poll/139880/ele…

2012: Romney, when rounded up, got 6% of the Black vote
2008: McCain got 1% of Black vote
2004: George W Bush got 7% of the Black vote
2000: George W Bush got 2% of the Black vote
1996: Bob Dole got 12% of the nonwhite vote [they do not break it down by race in 1996 which includes all  nonwhite people]

Trump 8% of the Black, so more than any Republican in the last 5 cycles, or last 20 years.

For Democrats:
2012: Obama got 95% of the Black vote
2008: Obama got 99% of the Black vote
2004:  Kerry got 93% of the Black vote
2000: Gore got 95% of the Black vote
1996: Bill Clinton got 82% of the nonwhite vote

Hillary Clinton only got 88% of the Black vote so less than any Democrat in 20 years
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/…

Why is this?

Let us look at 1990s when Bill Clinton was President he signed the 1994 Crime bill, Hillary Clinton went around the country championing this bill and what happened?

That bill led to the largest arrest of Black people under the Clinton administration, more than any other administration [Watch the NetFlix Documentary "13th" which discusses this.

This is when Hillary made her now infamous "super predators" comment which we all knew at the time to be coded language referring to Black youth, they were not speaking of White kids that way.

So you couple that with the Bill Clinton welfare reform bill which also, Hillary Clinton went around the country championing, which also greatly disproportionately had an adverse effect on Black people, which if you look at Bill Clinton's approval ratings when he was elected, to when he signed that bill to the next few years, you saw the numbers going down a bit..

Now, Hillary Clinton having championed this crime bill and this welfare reform bill are why in my opinion she did far worse with the Black vote than any Democrat in 20 years.

Now, Hillary Clinton also did worse than Obama did in 2012 among WOMEN now I will not go too much into that since.. she only did about 1.5 points less than Obama and Obama were setting records for women so she did well but  you would think, or I would have thought the idea of the first female president would have her numbers WAY ABOVE Obama but no..she did worse than Obama among women from his 2012 numbers..

Now, here goes the elephant in the room, THE WHITE VOTE!! OH THEY ARE ALL RACISTS SO THAT IS WHY TRUMP WON!

Are there some Trump voters that hold racist views and as such that is the reason at which they lost, sure, but to claim every white person who voted for Trump is a racist is just nonsense.

Now, I will piggyback on the Michael Moore argument when he said he walked around his State of Michigan, he said many white voters are voting for Trump not because they are racists but because these are a people, blue collar workers, who have are victims of free trade agreements, people who lost their job due to NAFTA, people who have not seen a raise in decades, people who have lost benefits, or had the price for their benefits raise without getting any more, these are people who have seen their jobs outsourced.

Then you have the current Democrat, Obama, who is pushing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) what has been called NAFTA on steroids, who would be to the greater detriment of these blue collar workers, who will see their jobs going overseas, and then you have a candidate in Hillary Clinton who went around the world selling TPP as the "Gold Standard" (her words) who these see as basically selling them down the river. Who is not helped by her friend since, Terry McAuliffe because, while Clinton was rather silent on the TPP until Bernie Sanders in the primary started coming out against it - when she finally did say she was against it, her friend, McAuliffe told reporters that she really supported it and once in office she would change a few things and pass it.

So Moore said, that these people are voting for Trump because you have the Democrats now selling them out, they know the system is corrupt, they know their politicians are bought BUT. AND HERE IS THE BUT they have the freedom of their vote, now a millionaire or a billionaire may buy a politician but they only have one vote and Moore said, a trump victory would be the biggest FUCK YOU to the system that these people, who feel marginalized by establishment politics can do

You also cannot say OH THESE PEOPLE ARE RACISTS!!! Because Michigan and several other swing states with very high white populations, WENT FOR OBAMA IN 2012 AND IN 2008, so you cannot just say every white person only voted for Trump because they are racist - especially since both times Obama was running against white males.

They brought into Obama's hope and change like many did, so Obama was a breath of fresh air, and so they thought he would be different than the usual establishment politics...

This is a great time to also speak of the youth vote, and how Hillary did far worse among the youth than Obama did and why Trump did better among the youth than a Republican normally does.

This is a very anti-establishment year, as such people are looking for something to vote for and they are tired of the politics as usual, and sorry to say for Clinton but you have been in politics and around politics for Decades, and your platforms are very establishment platforms that .. you go middle of the road, people want something they can vote FOR ..and incremental change is all you were promising for the most part, so some younger voters did not vote, some voted for Trump, others third party .

THIRD PARTY SPOILERS?.. not really.
While on the subject of third parties, we must discuss them, the largest two third parties are the libertarian party and the green party. The Libertarian party is far larger and pulls more votes away from Republicans than Democrats.

Nader lies: in 2000 when you asked the people of Florida who voted for Nader.. most of them said if they had not voted for Nader they would have voted for BUSH so the idea that Nader cost Gore the 2000 election is nonsense...

But look at the swing states, and look at the libertarian and Green Party votes.. if you figure say Half of the Green Party voters may vote Democrat, and if you figure maybe 1/3 of the libertarian party would vote Democrat .. even if you add these numbers into Clinton's total for the places she lost, in none of those states I saw would that have been enough for her to get the win..

Sexism - are there many people in this country at which did not just want to see a female leader, of course, but I see no grand evidence that this groups would be of any large number of votes enough at which would have [had they not held these views and voted for her] been enough to switch the election over to her.. the electoral numbers would not be there.

At the end of the day, as I have said for months, you cannot just be  NON TRUMP and expect to win. Much of her platform, and the rhetoric of her and her supporters was just I'M NOT HIM!!! that is not enough.

It is no secret that I am no fan of Trump nor Clinton..and I Did not vote for either of em. I am in New York so because of the electoral college system we have, she did win NY Electoral votes.

[Notice: I gave you an analysis of why I think Trump won WITHOUT mentioning the emails even once, I gave you an argument on why Trump won without mentioning the scandals even once. BUT SURELY this also had some effect but I tried to give reasons, solid reasons, why Trump did better among these groups without just trying to say, as some are saying, it is all the scandals. it is all racists, it is the third party fault.. .)
WHY/HOW TRUMP WON
It has been almost a year since I have added anything to my gallery, so I figured I would post this post that I also just posted on my facebook.

No clue what to add here, the piece speaks for itself.

[if you see any errors in the numbers, do let me know I will fix it]
Loading...
This will be a short post because of something I just read

nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/…

Tim Kaine, the man Hillary Clinton chose as her VP will not put his name on a Senator resolution to push for a Public option

Then people wonder why Progressives like myself will not fall in line behind Clinton.

I do not do the fear based voting, and just saying you are not Trump is not enough to make me fall in line and vote for Clinton. I will not be voting for Clinton or Donald Trump.

But for my Democratic followers... why would Clinton who is not touting herself as a progressive *coughs* bullshit *coughs*  Pick a VP that is Pro-TPP, [a week before Hillary chose him as her VP he was praising the TPP, now he claims he is against it which no one really believes], he is pro-fracking, he is pro "right to work" laws [anti union laws], and now he is against a public option?

Why would clinton also choose a Pro-fracking unofficial lobbyist to lead her WH transition team in Ken Salazar?

I mean sooner or later simply saying I'M NOT HIM will not suffice

The first Presidential Debate is tomorrow evening .. so that should be interesting both sides have invited their own "agitators" . with HRC inviting Mark Cuban and DT having invited Bill Cclinton's former lover that he cheated on Hillary with, Gennifer Flowers..

 photo 13322190_1205065496191221_328342419071190805_n.jpg
  • Listening to: 4 Non Blondes - Dear Mr. President
  • Reading: the words on the screen...
  • Watching: the screen as I type..
  • Playing: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: nothing
I was asked my view of this "resistance".

My general view is I cannot take serious a movement who I feel morals and ethics are inconsistent to be fully honest. I have several followers who have the "I am the resistance" stuff on their pages and hey.. do you.

If you follow my facebook or twitter, then you already know my many issues with Obama.. and as such my origins for questioning this resistance starts there.

I will oppose Trump when he does terrible things, as I expect I will have to since I am an unapologetic leftist .. liberal..progressive..  but I will oppose Trumps on things I disagree with him as I did with Obama. My issue with many of these "resistance" people, usually or mostly Clinton supporters and Democrats (I did not vote for Clinton or Trump) .. is they were willfully blind when it was their team doing things.

Where was this resistance on a grand scale of marches, and such when Obama deported over 3 million people? breaking up families, causing so much pain? As a grand scale, they were nowhere.

Where was this resistance when some claim their most passionate about the environment when Obama approved 10 keystone sized pipelines just since 2010? I do not recall the massive marches against Obama for this.

Where was this resistance when Obama continuously armed Saudi Arabia who in turn used our weapons and are causing one the worst famines on earth in Yemen where millions of men, women and children are on the verge of starving because Saudi Arabia are using our weapons and refusing aid in some key areas? .. this happening under Nobel Peace Prize winner.. even after twice our own UN Ambassador under Obama asked him to stop selling arms to saudi Arabia and he..continued..

where was this massive resistance then?

Where was this massive resistance when Obama ran on protecting whistle blowers yet under Obama.. he has convicted more whistle blowers than every other administration combined..

Where was this resistance when just a week ago the DOJ, the Obama administration said all sixteen intelligence agencies will now receive the Metadata on American citizens and their international communications and other things? Surely an ever expanding government retaining more of your data is something worthy of resisting but... it was done under a Democrat so I guess not.



Now, should Trump be "resisted" sure, if he does things I disagree with I will call him out .. but you cannot just resist  when it is the other team doing something and then silent when it is YOUR TEAM.

If Trump loses in 2020 or he wins and you get a democrat in 2024.

if this democrat increased the number of places we are bombing, as Obama did when compared to Bush, will you resist?

If this democrat deports more people than the Republican before him, as Obama did when compared to Bush. will you resist?

If this democrat increases the countries that we have operations in will you resist? America now has operations going on in 33/54 African nations, that is 60% of Africa. AND THAT IS JUST WHAT THEY ARE ADMITTING TO.. who knows how many more we are.


So I admit it is hard for me to take some of the RESISTANCE people seriously because they seem to only want to resist when it is not their team doing it.

.. I especially have issues with some of these celebrities in the "resistance" who were going around saying if you did not vote for HRC then you are an idiot.. sorry, I cannot vote or someone that referring to black youth as super predators, that seemed to only mention black issues when she needed them to vote and was silent on em other times, who advocated for that which led to the largest arrest and incarceration of black bodies than at any other time in US history..
once again.. where was this resistance for this?


I love the constitution and as such I love the marches, peaceful marches going on around the country now.. but .. will these marches still be there when it is their party doing the terrible deeds or are they only there to resist Republicans and as many of my fellow leftists have been doing over the last 8 years, will turn a blind eye when it is TEAM DEMOCRAT

I will work with anyone to achieve mutual aims on things we agree with. So I respect and am sure on a lot of these issues will find myself in agreement with those who are marching today, but I also want to know are they only filled with anger because it is Trump or a Republican and will they continue such if a Democrat also starts doing much of the things they are claiming they are resisting?

But I find it hard to respect a resistance that did not stand up against a man who had an arm in one of the worst famines on earth .. that man being Obama. Now you cannot claim to care for human rights and then silent as someone you may have voted for, I voted for him, has a hand in such misery.

so that is one of the reasons why, though they have massive support judging from all of these marches that I am like eh.. when it comes to many of em.

Either something is wrong or it isn't. It cannot just be wrong when a Republican does it and then you turn a blind eye to the suffering of others when it is done under a Democrat.

I know many of my followers have different views, especially the ones who have all of the "I am the resistance" stuff on their page, but such is life.. everyone will have their own view on things.

I await to see if this resistance is simply resisting republicans or are just resisting wrong.. and on the "wrong" front Republicans do not hold an exclusive right to being wrong in our politics.
  • Listening to: 4 Non Blondes - Dear Mr. President
  • Reading: the words on the screen...
  • Watching: the screen as I type..
  • Playing: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: nothing

deviantID

AtheosEmanon
Emanon
Artist | Hobbyist | Varied
United States
"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."
-John Adams



Got an interesting topic for me? Just send me an email.. my user name on here @gmail.com and please put in the subject line DEVIANTART QUESTION.. and if it is something that I find interesting then I will write about it... will more than likely address sociopolitical, economic and ideological/partisan questions more than stuff like music and that stuff...

Stamp Requests:
to request a stamp simply comment my page, a particular stamp or send me a message asking for your request. As long as I do not consider it particularly hateful, or something which is made simply to say.. in general THIS GROUP IS EVIL BLAH BLAH... [I can do without the drama] I will be happy to oblige the request. If it is something that I would deem particularly hateful then it is not something that I would do or if is it something at which I may not agree with and have no interest of seeing it in my gallery.... I am sure you can find someone else willing to fill that request for you...

´´´´´´´$´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´$´´´´´´´
´´´´´´$$´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´$$´´´´´´
´´´´´´$$´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´$$´´´´´´
´´´´´´´$$s´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´s$$´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´$$$$´´´´´´´´´´´´´´$$$$´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´³$$$$´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´$$$$³´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´´³$$$$´¶¶¶¶¶¶´$$$$³´´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´¶´$$$$$´¶¶¶¶´$$$$$´¶´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´¶¶¶´$$$´¶¶¶¶¶¶´$$$´¶¶´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´¶¶¶´´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´´¶¶¶¶´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´´¶¶´´´´¶¶¶¶´´´´´¶´´´´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´´¶¶´´´´¶¶¶¶´´´´´¶¶´´´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´´´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´´´¶¶¶¶¶¶´´´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´´´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´´´´´´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´´´´´´´´´¶´¶´¶´¶´¶´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
´´´´´´¶´´´´´´´¶´´´´´´´¶´´´´´´´¶´´´´´´´
´´´´´¶¶´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´¶¶´´´´´´
´´´´´¶¶´´´´´´´´¶´´´´´¶´´´´´´´´¶¶´´´´´´
´´´´´¶¶´´´´´´´¶¶´´´´´¶¶´´´´´´´¶¶´´´´´´
´´´´´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶´´´´´´´¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´´´´´´
´´´¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶´´´´´´´¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶´´´´
´´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶´´´´´´´¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´´´
´´´¶¶¶¶´¶¶´¶¶´´´´´´´´´´´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶¶¶´´´´
´´´´¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶´´´´´´´´´´´¶¶´¶¶´¶¶¶´´´´´
♉ - 3F-H-S
Current Residence: New York, NY
Print preference: Any
Favorite photographer: A. K. Nicholas, Ken Marcus, Irving Klaw, Helmut Newton & many more

Favorite genre of music: Rap, hip hop, rock, metal, some country, R&B, blues
Favorite style of art: Erotica/Fetish/Nature Photography, sculpture, paintings
Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition
MP3 player of choice: I do not have a MP3 player, I therefore have no choice :spot:
Shell of choice: A room inside an insane asylum
Wallpaper of choice: Blood splattered walls....
Skin of choice: Yours, after I starve you and cut the skin from your limbs.
Favorite cartoon character: Huey & Riley, Boondocks Cartoon/Comic characters
Personal Quote: Man created the gods to have a sense of being divine ~Atheos Emanon
Interests

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconsection79:
Section79 Featured By Owner Jan 21, 2017
Do you know where I can find you on Twitter?
Reply
(1 Reply)
Flagged as Spam
(1 Reply)
:icontheravenousraven:
TheRavenousRaven Featured By Owner Nov 28, 2016
Out of curiosity, what were your thoughts on Fidel Castro?
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconchaudown450:
Chaudown450 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Turns out we're gonna have ourselves a Trump presidency.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconchaudown450:
Chaudown450 Featured By Owner Nov 1, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Ever notice that the same people who kiss up to local police when they beat down on a minority for arbitrary reasons, bash Federal Police for standing up to the ochlocratic militias?
Reply
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment: